Benjamin Vanderford's hoax execution video, though sick, raises important questions about the way the media operates.
The video is clearly a crude fake. But why didn't the TV channels -- and bloggers -- that reported on it make even the most basic checks as to its authenticity?
Who was the "hostage" in the video? Who did he work for? How long had he been "missing"? Any one of these questions would have shown the tape up to be sham.
In interviews, Vanderford hasn't expressed any remorse for his actions.
Why should he?
My newsroom has been discussing the way the genuine and horrific execution videos have been used by the terrorists and the media. We've been talking about whether we should broadcast the tapes at all and -- if so -- under what circumstances.
Vanderford's fake video has made a mockery of some sections of the media -- and has highlighted why that debate is so vital.
The answers are easy. Check the facts and don't let deadlines stop the checking. I automatically distrust all TV news reports having seen CNN and Sky in action in Israel. Posed reports, 'please could you all move closer', 'could you all shake you fists?'
ReplyDeletejust as an update, this idiot benjamin vanderford has started his own punk band, penis genius. check out the website here
ReplyDelete