At editorial meetings I attended last week there was robust debate over the decision to invite convicted paedophile Jonathan King onto Radio 5 Live.
Should we be giving air time to a child abuser who hasn't shown any remorse for his crimes?
Could the interview be justified on editorial grounds?
Could we give King's victims a solid defence for providing him with a platform on national radio?
The answer to all these questions is quite clearly no.
Should we be giving air time to a child abuser who hasn't shown any remorse for his crimes?
Could the interview be justified on editorial grounds?
Could we give King's victims a solid defence for providing him with a platform on national radio?
The answer to all these questions is quite clearly no.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home